Ugly Real Economic Growth Chart from Singapore Statistics-Part 2
Quoting from my favourite marketeer Seth Godin:
The only way to succeed is to be remarkable, to be talked about
So I was really amused that Peltier Tech picked up on my past article “Ugly Real Economic Growth Chart from Singapore Statistics” and was inspired to write another. Good ideas do travel.
I made certain aesthetics changes to an original chart from Singapore Statistics. 
Some modest changes and this was created:

What mirthed me was that the author proposed charts that had everything I hate about Excel charts.

He merely recoloured the original ugly chart! Compare and see for yourself.
I always wanted to combine business aesthetics and business savvy in Excel charts.
In my latest workshop Making Beautiful Excel Charts I will break all the traditional rules in Excel charting. What you get are designer-quality charting ideas with Excel.
Let me summarise some typical visual sins with a page from my new book.

That being said, I whipped up another version. Without be-labouring the point, the results are obvious for everyone to see.
Let me end this with Seth Godin’s words again:
The new Dream that markets around the world are embracing is this:
- Be Remarkable
- Be generous
- Create Art
- Make Judgement calls
- Connect people to new ideas
and we have no choice but to reward you.
Related posts:
- Ugly Real Economic Growth Chart from Singapore Statistics. Singapore Statistics have the most amazing numbers on Singapore. Anything on our country’s GDP to how many handphones we have on average can be found....





Whilst i agree with what you have said in this post, the PT chart shown here is basically a reworking of the original data, but tidied up a little, I think that the PT post quiet obliviously used the reworking as a stepping stone to develop a Panel Chart.
Now I am not saying that the panel chart is better or worse than your suggested alternative (here or originally), but if you are going to respond to the PT alternative & comment on your alternative, then at least state what the PT alternative is, not the half way point. That is, show a bit more integrity.
You both offer good info websites, no need to be squabbling.
Anyway, that is my 2 cents worth.
Thanks,
ASM